2010Q3 Grant Proposal: FRDCSA Initial Release
Sun, 01-Aug-2010 by
Alberto Simões
edit post
<![CDATA[
<h1>FRDCSA Initial Release</h1>
<dl>
<dt><strong>Name:</strong></dt>
<dd>
<p>Andrew John Dougherty</p>
</dd>
<dt><strong>Email:</strong></dt>
<dd>
<p>[hidden email] [hidden email]</p>
</dd>
<dt><strong>Amount Requested:</strong></dt>
<dd>
<p>$2250 +- $750 is how much is needed to release it, but a full
computation of its value is not known to me - although the OFCS system
designed by Teddy Goldenberg and soon-to-be implemented by the
system-implementor codebase would be able to make a more informed
estimate.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>
</p>
<h2>Synopsis</h2>
<p>The FRDCSA consists of, among other things, over 1700 Perl5 modules in
various stages of completion that operate in a tightly interwoven
fashion. There are many entire systems for novel and important
applications, especially from various subjects in Artificial
Intelligence, as well as wrappers and APIs for other useful systems.
Unfortunately, owing to their interdependence, lack of tests and
documentation, need for a systematic renaming and deidentification -
distributing them through CPAN has not yet been accomplished, although
most of the software required to compute their distribution has been
written. I seek a grant to facilitate their release either in
majority or totality.</p>
<h2>Benefits to the Perl Community</h2>
<p>This grant IMHO would greatly improve the situation for Artificial
Intelligence through Perl. But the benefits are not limited to pure
theory, they are very practical - as these techniques, and the systems
for which wrapping is provided, would then be instantly accessible to
the entire Perl community. I do not expect the project to be
understood from the getgo, however, as Perl programmers come across
it, by searching CPAN for various tools, it should draw a small amount
of attention - enough to bring the true benefits of the cohesive and
interwoven system to the attention of Perl power users. As I am not a
Perl expert, I am not familiar with all of the greatest aspects of
Perl - however, I do know that there are many systems lacking for
which I have labored over 10 years to provide the matching
capabilities. Getting some attention for my project would be
important to secure the goals of the system. The system, such as it
is, is an attempt to implement a transfinite solution to Hilbert's
problem. In this sense, it contains as its goal to solve all
mathematical problems, which are thought to impose themselves on the
real world. Goedelian incompleteness is not an obstacle, it is the
cornerstone, based on associating logics with increasingly complete
systems of logic ala Turing 1939.</p>
<p>How will this advance the release of Perl 6?</p>
<p>Interesting question that was not in the first template I filled out.
I have often wondered whether this system is necessary to complete
Perl6. I cannot comment precisely on exactly what it will do wrt the
existing Perl 6 spec. However, if that spec is mutable, I think there
are essential components. That is to say, if we can think of Perl 6
as being a more capable or "intelligent" version of Perl, then the
availability of these tools will greatly enhance and furnish that
goal. For instance, there is limited existing CPAN support for
Semantic Web, Theorem Proving, or certain individual techniques from
Natural Language Processing. One component of the FRDCSA is FRDCSAL
which is a Perl based programming language where you write the code in
English, and the code is translated to logic and executed. True,
these are Perl5 modules, but when the automated refactoring system is
complete, and the formal specification is complete - it will be
possible to translate semi-automatically to Perl6. There is also a
subproject called Perform: which is a knowledge base about algorithms
and data structures - which includes their complexity and all kinds of
other features, intended as a devastatingly complete standard library
for Perl6.</p>
<p>
</p>
<h2>Deliverables</h2>
<p>First, please make sure my webservers are still online. My static IPs
are scheduled to be cancelled and the server will go down whilst I
covert it to Dynamic DNS. (Alternatively funding would allow me to
keep the IPs.) If there is an issue - I can create a large tarball of
all the items and send it upon request.</p>
<p>Many to all modules released.</p>
<p>Here is a very recent module list:</p>
<p><a href="http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo/projects/module-list.txt">http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo/projects/module-list.txt</a></p>
<p>For more information, please see the ancient description. Upon
request I can regenerate the pages to reflect the current situation.</p>
<p><a href="http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa.">http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa.</a></p>
<p>I have just this year started writing GUIs as frontends for various
systems: Here is a page on that:</p>
<p><a href="http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo/projects/frdcsa-guis">http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo/projects/frdcsa-guis</a></p>
<p>There is also:
<a href="http://frdcsa.org">http://frdcsa.org</a>
<a href="http://posithon.org">http://posithon.org</a> and
<a href="http://intranet.posithon.org">http://intranet.posithon.org</a></p>
<p>I am not familiar with milestone documents. The critical path is in
the process of being computed, but won't be finished prior to the
actual release. Here is an outdated document that sort of documents
that:</p>
<p><a href="http://files.meetup.com/970635/semweb.pdf">http://files.meetup.com/970635/semweb.pdf</a></p>
<p>I have since added nested formulae and First Order w/Equality
inferencing to FreeKBS2 - which makes the planning system much more
capable - however, it has not been fully updated to use the new
backend and so is not usable at the moment.</p>
<p>Also see number 13 at:</p>
<p><a href="http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo/projects/frdcsa-guis/">http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo/projects/frdcsa-guis/</a></p>
<p>
</p>
<h2>Project Details</h2>
<p>The project is based primarily on Algorithmic Information Theory, and
"Information Theoretic Limitations of Formal Systems". The basic idea
is that, given a particular Turing machine, in order to accomplish
tasks of increasing complexity, the software must ultimately grow in
program length. Therefore, a necessary but insufficient condition for
an "Artificial Intelligence" that has many capabilities is that it is
large. This means that one heuristic for finding existing such
systems is that the system is large. This immediately makes one think
of Perl, Debian and Emacs - which all check out as extremely capable
systems. The system is based upon these, but will not be exclusive to
them. However, as comprehensive as CPAN is, there are still elements
missing.</p>
<p>Hence, we contemplate how to grow the system - there are two
approaches - write software by ourselves - or find existing software.
Both are taken. To find existing software, both existing large
metasites (Sourceforge/Freshmeat/Google Code/etc) and active focused
crawling for the location of new software. The Flossmole project
releases data. To classify the data, the Debian tags and Sourceforge
categories have been trained via an SVM text classifier to classify
new entries according to these folksonomies. All this information
goes into the CSO (Comprehensive Software Ontology). Focused crawling
is achieved with the radar-web-search system, a multithreaded spider
that searches several ply deep on websites for files that would seem
to be useful. These are downloaded and go through an entire system
which I cannot help but to compare to a digestive system. They are
(semi-)automatically packaged for Debian using the Packager system.</p>
<p>For writing software, there are an equal number of sundry systems that
expedite that process. For instance, all kinds of project templates
and functions exist in the BOSS system. A particularly useful trick
is ppi-convert-script-to-module.pl, which takes a script and converts
it bit by bit to the standard Object Oriented Perl Module format. It
is an example of a hand-coded automated refactoring that is going to
be rearchitected into a deliberative automated refactoring system.</p>
<p>What is the goal of the project? The project aims to characterize all
arguments for and against various beliefs, audit them for relative
considerations, and present people with, if possible, a uniquely
action guiding moral support intelligent agent. The basic goal of the
project is to resolve problems that affect sentient beings in an
equinaminous and peaceful manner. Many resource conflicts can be
avoided through more rational behavior.</p>
<p>
</p>
<h2>Inch-stones</h2>
<p>There are several primary tasks for the project wrt CPAN. They are:
Release, Refactor, Test and Document. The first three have
corresponding automatic implementations: Release -> Task1, Refactor ->
CodeMonkey, Test -> icodebase-testing. Documentation will be largely
by hand and/or copied from my existing documents. Task1 is mostly
complete. Refactor is 10-15% complete. Test is not really started.
To fit within the time frame of the 3 month release schedule, I will
focus only on Release (unless it happens faster than expected).</p>
<p>Release is divided into: Dependencies, Renaming, Deidentification,
Testing. Dependencies are already computed but will be tidied up
(have to reacquaint myself with the Task1 codebase), and possibly will
now use FreeKBS2 logic programming to simplify the tasks. Testing
will be only as necessary. Only about 2% of tests have been written.
Renaming requires testing (to prevent large scale breakages), but is
otherwise straightforward. Deidentification is tedious, however the
Classify deidentification system is about 50-60% complete.</p>
<p>This should be enough to get the project into use and should generate
future interactions which will ensure its completion.</p>
<p>
</p>
<h2>Project Schedule</h2>
<p>Project will take <= 3 months.</p>
<p>Can begin immediately upon receipt of initial funding segment.</p>
<p>
</p>
<h2>Completeness Criteria</h2>
<p>The project will be complete if most of the important systems of the
FRDCSA are in CPAN and are not in a catastrophic condition. Given
that there are 1700 modules, it is not reasonable (unless the
automated refactoring system is finished, populated with adequate
rules, and extremely accurate) to expect me to bring the code up to
the quality standards that I myself do not know. Therefore, having
them available in CPAN should be enough to attract attention to them,
at which point in time what I need to do will be told to me rather
than queried blindly and annoyingly of Perl experts. Many of them
already function perfectly adequately or even superbly.</p>
<p>
</p>
<h2>Bio</h2>
<p>Who are you? What makes you the best person to work on this project?</p>
<p>Tounge-in-cheek: I am nobody. Nobody is working on this.</p>
<p>Alternatively, and please delete if you don't like it:</p>
<p>My life has been hinted to as being unexamined and a quixotic quest to
implement a restricted form of weak artificial intelligence.</p>
<p>I studied mathematics at the University of Illinois at Urbana
Champaign for 4 years, mainly auditing the graduate mathematics
classes to the detriment of my undergraduate studies. It was there
that I developed the theory of artificial intelligence called FRDCSA
based on Information Theoretic Limitations of Formal Systems and
Algorithmic Information Theory. This mathematical theory, combined
with practical considerations, implies that certain modules be present
in CPAN. However, I could not find them. So I set out to write these
modules. (I have presented twice at YAPC about this system, but was
embarassed by the presentations which were both completed with limited
time resources. I had not finished the most important slide, and
there were over 4 errors on it, so I just skipped over it. And in the
second one, it sounded as if I were preaching to the community. Also,
despite testing ahead of time, the audio but not video played.) I
also moved to Pittsburgh where I worked at CMU as a research
programmer and teacher for students on the autistic spectrum, while
completing the modules. However, I have tried to release the modules
but have never been able to finish that effort. Funding would set up
the proper circumstances for this to happen. The effort to release my
life's work is reckoned important enough that the system which
computes the release is called Task1.</p>
<p>I am writing this to prevent bad things from happening to people, in
memory of my loving sister, Ann. If I can prevent one person from
going through what we went through it will have been a success. But
being free software, it could help many more at no marginal cost.</p>
]]>
Comments (4)
What does FRDCSA stand for? (It's not defined in the first screen's worth of paragraphs in this proposal.)
FRDCSA =
Formalized Research Database: Cluster, Study and Apply
I find this whole proposal way too vague. A good AI toolkit for Perl would be interesting to have, but I'm not having enough data to judge how good or useful this toolkit is or how much work it will be to to get this work done.
http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa/introduction/intro.html
